By Madelyn McKinney and Jerielle Cartales The Island School site, excavated by CAP in the summer of 2025, was filled to the brim with architectural debris from the schoolhouse’s destruction in the 1960s. Most of this was fairly generic: shards of plain window pane glass, …
By Alex Wesorick I’m a junior student at MSU, and I have been working for Dr. Stacey Camp this semester, looking for information about some of our school’s oldest students. The original goal of the semester was to identify individuals found in a photo of …
During the hectic summer of 2020, CAP Crew had the opportunity to excavate sections of a mid-twentieth century midden uncovered by water main replacement construction along Service Road, a thoroughfare running east to west through the southern half of campus. Landfills, of course, are like treasure troves for archaeologists, and finding one associated with the decades during which MSU’s population saw some of its biggest growth was especially riveting. From ballet shoes to faunal remains, hygiene products to handwritten notes, and spice jars to MSU-stamped institutional wares, the Service Road collection contains something of interest to everyone.
Some of the less expected artifacts uncovered during the Service Road excavation were a number of still-legible newspaper fragments––most from Michigan and others from places as far away as Puerto Rico. The majority of these newspaper pieces are precariously held together by decades worth of dirt, making them much too fragile to peel apart. Fortunately for this blog post, however, a few of them could be isolated––and can now be identified!
Identifying fragmented newspapers can be a simpler process than one might think. A plethora of newspaper archives exist both digitally (in online archives) and materially (within libraries, museums, and other federally, state, and locally-funded preservation offices). The website newspapers.com (owned by Ancestry and unfortunately only accessible via a paid subscription) is a particularly valuable source for finding historic newspapers dating between the 1690s and 2020s. By entering keywords, date ranges, and locations, it’s possible to locate and read the full versions of mere scraps of newspaper like those from Service Road.
It’s important to note that when entering keywords into an online archive like this one, it’s most productive to use words from articles that have local significance. Articles with national or international relevance were often published in a number of newspapers across the world, so it’s much harder to locate a specific newspaper company and publication date when using these more general headlines.
I learned this firsthand when I decided to use the first legible headline I saw––“Pope Names 2 Bishops”––in my preliminary search. This was a problem for two main reasons. First, similar articles were published all over the world due to the international significance of the Pope and the Vatican. Second (and much less predictably), this specific segment of the Service Road newspaper page happened to be from a slightly different edition of the newspaper than the one stored within the online archive.
Now, let me explain what this means––and why it was a bit confusing. The “Pope Names 2 Bishops” article was published in the December 12, 1957 version of the Detroit Free Press––which makes sense given that all of the other fragmentary pages examined from these segments of CAP’s collection also line up with this date and press. Notably, however, the advertisements surrounding the article differ between CAP’s edition of the paper and the archived edition from newspapers.com (see Figure 1). In addition, the spacing between paragraphs also differs between the two––and the articles above and images below “Pope Names Two Bishops” are clearly different depending on which edition is examined. In researching why this was, I learned through Laurel Brake, a professor emerita of literature and print culture, that it wasn’t––and still isn’t––uncommon for daily or weekly newspapers to publish multiple editions, as this helps them to stay on top of the latest and greatest stories––and therefore compete with other newspaper producers (2012, 12). Thus, it’s possible that the edition CAP discovered came out slightly earlier or later than the edition available within newspapers.com’s archives––which is something worth noting (and being cautious of) during future newspaper examinations.
Figure 1: CAP’s edition of the Detroit Free Press (right) versusnewspapers.com’s edition (left).
Now that we’ve identified the newspaper and discussed how best to identify such documents, let’s take a look at the actual contents of the paper. Though it is impossible to summarize all 52-pages of advertisements, articles, and lists within a single blog post, I will briefly delve into two major components that I found to be especially entertaining or engaging: a surplus of Christmas advertisements (after all, this did come out less than two weeks before the holiday!) and a few brief mentions of Michigan State University. As you read through the following sections, keep in mind that these were the topics being actively read about by MSU’s students and staff on or around December 12, 1957. We know that this newspaper was read by someone on campus, and with its identification, we’ve now captured a moment in time––a moment that we can understand, if only a little, through reading about the events and items deemed important on this day.
Let’s now delve into some of the paper’s most interesting holiday advertisements! Many of the largest and most prominent ads in this periodical focus on women’s clothing––especially dresses, winter items (gloves, scarfs, coats), undergarments, shoes, and nightgowns. Interestingly, every women’s clothing advertisement relies on artistic depictions of women with stereotypically idealized proportions––there are no models, photographs, or mannequins (see Figure 2). A variety of other advertisements geared toward women are also present, and these mainly promote perfumes, bags, and jewelry––though there are plenty of Christmas table settings and holiday food items thrown into the mix.
Figure 2: A women’s loungewear advertisement by Federal Department Store (Detroit, MI).
Beyond women’s clothing, there are also a variety of advertisements for children’s toys presents. Figure 3 (below) shows four toys, all of which are gendered: a doll carriage, a doll wearing a sailor pinafore, a Wild West-themed sheriff’s play set, and a mini fort with 20 small cavalrymen to man it. These toys appear both well-made and especially fun for make-believe play, though it is also worth noting that they are excellent examples of toys that reinforce domestic and social roles. The doll and carriage would have prompted girls to naturally practice and consider activities related to motherhood, while the sheriff’s play set and fort both romanticize the roles of men in war and peacekeeping––likely influencing young boys to practice potentially aggressive and competitive behaviors through play. These trends in gendered toys continue into the twenty-first century (see Blakemore and Centers 2005), though it is important to be aware that in the United States, they largely began during the Industrial Revolution––when toys began to be mass-produced and children were identified as populations from which markets could directly benefit (Schultz 2018; Mumma and Baxter 2018).
Figure 3: Children’s toys advertised as part of Federal Department Store’s Toy Sale.
Though there are dozens of other interesting advertisements within this periodical, let’s take a moment now to examine its few references to Michigan State University. My favorite of these is “$3,500 Steer to Put Girl Through MSU,” a brief article about Carol Payne, an 18-year old girl who sold a 1,005 pound Black Angus at the 4-H Junior Livestock auction in order to pay her tuition. According to the American Institute for Economic Research (2024), $3,500 in 1957 would be nearly $40,000 today––and was certainly more than enough to pay Carol’s tuition in 1957!
The rest of the articles about MSU focus specifically on sports––which is topically less interesting than a cow paying someone’s tuition, but we’ll take what we can get. These articles emphasize one man in particular: Hugh Duffy Daugherty, one of MSU’s most beloved and well-known head football coaches. At this time in 1957, he had been at MSU for 11 years––and other institutions were actively trying to hire him. In spite of this, he remained at Michigan State, citing his love for the institution as his reason for doing so. Evidently, the university loved him back, as he remained the head coach for nearly 20 years before retiring––12 years after which he was inducted into the National Football Foundation’s Hall of Fame (2025).
And that’s all for this blog post! If there’s interest, I would be happy to return to this edition (or perhaps other papers from Service Road) for further ponderings and analyses.
Blakemore, Judith E. Owen, and Renee E. Centers. 2005. Characteristics of Boys’ and Girls’ Toys. Sex Roles 53(9): 619-633.
Brake, Laurel. 2012. The Longevity of ‘Ephemera’: Library Editions of Nineteenth-Century Periodicals and Newspapers. Media History 18(1): 7-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13688804.2011.632192.
Detroit Free Press (DFP) [Detroit, Michigan]. 1957. 12 December:1-52. Accessed November 10, 2025. newspapers.com.
Mumma, Katherine, and Jane Eva Baxter. 2018. Creating Desire and Little Consumers: Doll Advertising in US Newspapers, 1860-1900. In Nineteenth Century Childhoods in Interdisciplinary and International Perspectives, edited by Jane Eva Baxter and Meredith A.B. Ellis, pp. 107-126. Oxbow Books, Oxford.
Schultz, Jaclyn N. 2018. ‘He Knows a Good Thing When He Sees It!’ Advertising to Children in the US, 1850-1900. In Nineteenth Century Childhoods in Interdisciplinary and International Perspectives, edited by Jane Eva Baxter and Meredith A.B. Ellis, pp. 91-106. Oxbow Books, Oxford.
Acknowledgements
Special thanks to Ben Akey (former Campus Archaeologist) for allowing me to use their newspapers.com subscription while examining these artifacts.
By Rylee LaLonde Got Milk? Students at the Island School certainly did, delivered fresh daily in glass bottles! During the summer of 2025, Michigan State University’s (MSU) Campus Archaeology Program (CAP) excavated what was once the Island School, now a farm field. Among the artifacts …
By Madelyn McKinney and Andrew Kracinski The Maryland Archaeological Conservation Laboratory (MAC Lab) has, for many years now, explored the uses of radiography (the imaging technique that produces x-rays) in archaeological artifact curation, conservation, and research. Available online, Sarah Rivers Cofield and Nichole Doub’s An …
Well, it’s been a long summer, but we’re going to get in the spirit of Spooky Season with the follow-up everyone has been waiting for: what is the CAPacabra?
If you missed Part 1, the CAPacabra is a mummified animal discovered in the ceiling of MSU’s Cook-Seever Hall during renovations in 2018. While there is a CAP 3D image on SketchFab calling it an opossum, this has been debated, with others arguing it may be a large rat, or even a small dog or cat. In Part I, we looked at the gross anatomy to make an estimation of age and species. We looked at the skull shapes for raccoon, opossum, cat, and dog, and successfully ruled out some options: the CAPacabra is definitely not a cat, rat, or opossum!
The “CAPacabra”, a skeletonized animal of undetermined species, found in the ceiling of the Cook-Seever Hall during the 2018 remodel.
Since then, I have taken some radiographs of the CAPacabra to share with you all. If you’ve never read a radiograph before, here is Radiography 101:
Radiographs take a three-dimensional object and smash it down into 2D, so we end up looking at everything layered one on top of another
This affects the density of the image, which is essentially what we’re looking at: denser areas show up as brighter and whiter in the radiograph
I mentioned in Part 1 that the forelimbs look more like raccoon hands than dog paws. Below is the full-body image of our CAPacabra. The head is to the left, and the tail is to the right.
A full-body radiograph of the “CAPacabra”. The head is to the left and the tail is to the right.
One of the forelimbs is twisted under the body which makes it harder to see, but the other is beautifully positioned! One of the first things we can see is that there are 5 digits positioned in a manner fairly similar to what we have as humans. In the image gallery below, you can see a close up of the CAPacabra’s hand, along with a dog paw and a raccoon hand for comparison.
CAPacabra handDog paw (Dr. Shadowgazer, X.com)Raccoon hand (CROW Clinic, X.com)
If this were a forensic case, I would immediately rule out the dog as a possibility – there are inconsistencies (number of digits) that cannot be explained by natural variation. That leaves us with the racoon as the most likely possibility.
But just to be extra sure, here is a radiograph of a juvenile (living) raccoon:
A radiograph of a subadult (juvenile) raccoon. The head is to the left and the tail is to the right (Gordon, 2024)
The similarities to our CAPacabra are pretty pronounced, beyond just the structure of the hand. For instance, check out the jaw structure, the braincase dimensions (red arrow), and the dental arcade (especially molars indicated by yellow arrow).
A comparison between the CAPacabra (left) and the juvenile raccoon imaged by Gordon (2024) (right).
I feel pretty confident in making a final call: the CAPacabra is a raccoon!
References
CROW Clinic. (2022, April 14). The raccoon had multiple fractures, several abscessed (formed pockets of infection) wounds. Retrieved October 22, 2025, from https://x.com/CROWClinic/status/1514714755256262664
Dr. Shadowgazer. (2020, September 25). even dog paw xrays are 😭😭😭 we don’t deserve them. Retrieved October 22, 2025, from https://x.com/DShadowgazer/status/1309682378630144001
Gordon, V. (2024). Successful treatment of aspiration pneumonia in a juvenile raccoon (Procyon lotor). Wildlife Rehabilitation Bulletin, 42(2), 60–65. https://doi.org/10.53607/wrb.v42.290
Happy Fall everyone! We are excited to announce that we will hosting Apparitions & Archaeology a Haunted Tour event this October! This event has been a long standing collaboration between the Campus Archaeology Program and the undergraduate Paranormal Society at MSU. Come join us to …
Hi! My name is Jerielle and I’m a first year CAP fellow, working on my PhD in forensic anthropology. I have an undergraduate degree in biology and a masters degree in forensic anthropology. Unlike many other CAP fellows, my interests lean more towards (human) skeletal …
Sometimes, when archaeologists are lucky, we run into botanical remains. In my personal research, I look at microbotanicals (like pollen, starches, and phytoliths) from dental calculus (the stuff your dental hygienist scrapes off of your teeth!) to understand diet. Because calculus fossilizes during a person’s life, it provides a unique view into what a person was interacting with. But this isn’t the only way that archaeologists study botanical remains. Sometimes we run into macrobotanicals, or plant remains that you can see without a microscope. A prime example of this is stone fruit seeds!
Stone fruits come from deciduous trees originally belonging to temperate zones (Elleuch and Hamdi, 2024). Some examples of stone fruits include peaches, nectarines, plums, apricots, cherries, and mangos (Maringgal et al., 2020). There are three distinct parts, including the flesh (exocarp and mesocarp), the seed, and the woody endocarp (the portion encompassing the seed) (Figure 1, Famiani et al., 2020). Many people may confuse the endocarp with the seed, but we have to be careful not to conflate them when trying to make an identification. This can lead to misidentification of the fruit in question. Further, knowing the difference between endocarps from stone fruits versus other drupes, like walnuts, is integral to understanding what types of food sources people may have been interacting with in the past.
Figure 1 from Famiani et al., 2020. Here you can see the different parts of a stone fruit, including the difference between the endocarp and the seed.
CAP found two examples of stone fruit endocarps during the 2024 field season in our Spartan Solar project. Spartan Solar, which you can read a little bit more about here, is an ongoing project we initially started in response to plans to construct a solar farm in the south-eastern reaches of campus (now cancelled). This section of campus currently hosts several agricultural research and teaching facilities, as well as a number of pastures for bovine and ovine livestock on campus.
While preparing to do fieldwork in the vicinity, CAP identified a series of eight late-19th to mid-twentieth farmsteads overlapping with the project’s boundaries (Akey 2022). Our efforts to survey and excavate these small family run farms have revealed several middens composed of materials dating to the mid-twentieth century, shortly before the university purchased the land parcels to expand their operations. In some cases, these features may be related to the process of the university clearing out and demolishing extant structures on the property, which can be seen in contemporaneous aerial photographs of the area. It is from one of these contexts–filled with concrete debris, ferrous structural fasteners, hooks, and chainlink fragments, as well as a variety of fragmented glass and ceramic containers–that the stone fruit endocarps were recovered.
One of the endocarps was wholly intact (Figure 2), while one was broken open (Figures 3 and 4) – the latter seemed to have the seed previously removed. Given that stone fruit seeds are rarely eaten by humans due to the high cyanide content, the cracked example with the missing seed may represent the foraging activity of rodents or other animals.
Figure 2: Endocarp #1 from Spartan Solar. Photo by Aubree Marshall.Figure 3: Endocarp #2 from Spartan Solar. Photo by Aubree Marshall.Figure 4: Endocarp #2 from Spartan Solar. Photo by Aubree Marshall.
While looking over the endocarps and comparing them to the reference photo in Figure 5, we identified several surface features that were noted. For example, both endocarp examples have the apiculate apex present, as well as grooves, pits, and both longitudinal and transverse furrows. After we identified the surface features, we then compared our specimen to published examples of drupe endocarps (Figure 6). The presence of the surface features labeled above (apiculate apex, grooves, pits, longitudinal and transverse furrows) and the size of the specimen ruled out several similar stone fruits such as cherries, apricots, and plums. While other drupes have pretty similar endocarps, after comparing the CAP endocarps to other reference samples, I believe that our endocarps most likely represent a specimen of Prunus persica – the species that comprises both peaches and nectarines. Due to the common peach and nectarines representing different cultivars of the same species, it is difficult to make a further determination as to which is represented within the Spartan Solar Collection.
Figure 5: An archaeological peach endocarp versus a modern peach endocarp. Scale bar = 1 cm. Fossil and modern peach pits (From Su et al., 2015).Figure 6 from Martello et al., 2023. Endocarps from multiple stone fruits.
In the context in which we found these endocarps, this process of identification provides some information related to possible subsistence and/or production patterns at the site. Aerial photography of the site (Figure 7) from 1938 and 1950 shows the presence of a large orchard directly north of the area we shovel-tested and excavated in 2024. For some past farmstead research, CAP has been able to use the U.S. Census ‘agricultural schedules’ to identify what products were produced at such sites, but these records are typically only available for the latter 19th-century (see Janesko 2018 for an example of how agricultural schedules can be used in archival phases of archaeological research). In absence of detailed records on what the farmstead would have been producing in the mid-20th century, these peach/nectarine pits may provide an indicator that part of the orchard was dedicated to stone fruit production, which is further bolstered by the fact that some varieties of peaches and nectarines grow well in the local climate (USDA Hardiness Zone 6a).
Figure 7: A set of historical aerial photographs from the area of the Spartan Solar Project CAP investigated in 2024. Note the orchard visible above the shovel-testing area, which is removed between 1950 and 1955–alongside the farmstead residence and outbuildings–following acquisition of the land parcel by the university in 1949.
In the midst of searching for reference collections, we decided that it might be helpful to create a reference collection of our own for quick identification of stone fruit pits and other drupes. Due to the seasonal availability of certain drupes such as cherries and apricots, we decided to hold off including this process in this blogpost, and to split this idea off into a new blogpost later this semester – stay tuned!
References:
Akey, Benjamin (2022). Solar Project 2022 – Historical Background Research. Report prepared for the Campus Archaeology Program, Michigan State University, Lansing, Mi.
Dal Martello, R., M von Baeyer, M Hudson, R.G. Bjorn, C. Leipe, B Zach, B Mir-Makhamad, T.N. Billings, I.M. Muñoz Fernández, B. Huber … R.N. Spengler (2023). Domestication and Dispersal of Large-Fruiting Prunus spp.: A Metadata Analysis of Archaeobotanical Material. Agronomy 13(1027). https://doi.org/ 10.3390/agronomy13041027
Elleauch, Amine and Imen Hamdi (2024). Naturally occurring viroid diseases of economically important plants in Aftrica. In Fundamentals of Viroid Biology. Eds C.R. Adkar-Purushothama, T. Sano, J.P. Perreault, S.M. Yanjarappa, F. Di Serio, J.A. Daròs. Academic Press, pp. 133-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-99688-4.00013-4.
Famiani F, Bonghi C, Chen Z-H, Drincovich MF, Farinelli D, Lara MV, Proietti S, Rosati A, Vizzotto G and Walker RP (2020) Stone Fruits: Growth and Nitrogen and Organic Acid Metabolism in the Fruits and Seeds—A Review. Plant Sci. 11:572601. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.57260.
Maringgal, Bernard, Norhashila Hashim, Intan Syafinaz Mohamed Amin Tawakkal, and Mahmud Tengku Muda Mohamed (2020). Recent advance in edible coating and its effect on fresh/fresh-cut fruits quality. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 96 (253-267). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.12.024.
Happy October y’all! We are happy to announce that we will be once again hosting our Haunted Tour event following last year’s hiatus. While we may have missed last year, 2024 represents the tenth anniversary of Apparitions & Archaeology, a long lasting collaboration between the …