Introducing our latest artifact of the week series: Lab Artifact of the Week! In this evolving exhibit you will see some of our favorite artifacts from ongoing work in the CAP laboratory. Each week we will share one artifact on Instagram, highlighting how we identify and learn from material culture. As students and archaeologists, we all have different experiences and knowledges…we can never know everything! Each time we step into the lab we learn (or re-learn) something.
We invite you to come learn with us as we share our methods, lab tips and tricks, and what we appreciate or are frustrated by. Comment on this post or on our Instagram page with any questions, advice, or your own stories of working with material culture!
Newspapers and magazines are not designed to be permanent, when they are not carefully preserved these fascinating artifacts can quickly be lost. If a newspaper does show up in an archaeological dig, they give archaeologists a great way to date a stratum (soil layer) or feature (soil representing an event). We can be fairly certain that the newspaper did not enter the feature or layer before that date, known to archaeologists as the terminus post quem, or “date after which.”
Left: Tattered newspaper fragment, dated Wednesday February 12, 1958 recovered from Service Road Construction, 2020. Newspaper is likely the Lansing State Journal. Image courtesy of Rhian Dunn. Right: Archival image of Lansing State Journal, Wednesday February 12, 1958. Call-out box shows same article as on the fragment recovered from Service Road.
Thank you, technology! In the age of smartphones and watches – and who knows what else – it can be easy to forget just how much the structure of research has changed. Finding the right newspaper could have once taken weeks – and now is one click away with a few choice key words in a search engine. While it may not always be easy to find original sources, we lucked out this week and were able to not only find the original newspaper, but the exact page that our #artifactoftheweek came from! This scrap of newspaper came from our Service Road excavation last summer and is extremely interesting for several reasons. First, it has a date! While many of artifacts from this excavation suggest an era extending from the 1930-60s, having an exact date is one sure way to verify our findings and help form new hypotheses or research paths. Secondly, it tells us more about the people who lived here and confirms that this newspaper was in circulation on MSU’s campus. We love to see that our local newspaper was making an impact even then!
Something seemed a little fishy in the lab this week – and by that, of course I mean our new #artifactoftheweek!
This old sardine can is another one of our many new artifacts that came from last summers the Service Road construction project. Although many of us are familiar with sardines (and may even have strong opinions about them being on our pizza), you may not know that the source of this can, Maine, was one of the biggest hubs for sardine canneries over the last century.
At its peak in the 1950s, Maine boasted approximately 50 canneries and employed thousands of workers! Maine sardine canneries first gained traction in the 1870s, but none are active today – in fact, the last sardine cannery in Maine, and in the United States, closed down almost 11 years ago.
Although not visible in this image due to its distorted shape, the bottom of the can reads “EASTPORT MAINE.” And this text helps us identify the source of this can as the Holmes Packing Corp. of Eastport in Rockland Co., Maine! This cannery was active from 1946 until a fire destroyed the building in 1985, which fits in with the other dates we’ve found from our Service Road artifacts (ca. 1940-60s).
One fun fact: The Holmes Packing Corp. actually trademarked the term “Sea Foam” for their canned fish from 1921 to 2007!
“Minnie Thomas, 9 years old, showing average size of sardine knife used in cutting. Some of the children used a knife as large as this. Minnie works regularly in Seacoast Canning Co., Factory #7, mostly in the packing room, and when very busy works nights. Cuts some, also cartons. She says she earns $2.00 some days, packing.” Image courtesy of the Library of Congress.
Prior to Holmes opening in 1946, Eastport already was the site of many sardine canneries. Prior to federal laws regulating child-labor in the 1930s, factory owners often hired children to work in their canneries. Read more about this history in an article by Alex Q. Arbuckle. The image above is one of many amazing photographs by sociologist Lewis Hine included in Arbuckle’s article.
Taking a Shine to Lab Work
Today, we are taking a look at another blast from the past from the Service Road construct project: An Esquire shoe polish bottle. If you aren’t familiar with this particular brand of shoe polish, this was actually the bestselling brand from 1940-60s in the United States!
During its reign at the top of the market, Esquire Shoe Polish and the Knomark Manufacturing Company that produced the polish were owned by Sam and Albert Adams. These two brothers turned the tides of the previously ailing company by pushing a strong advertising campaign, which included the famous Kate Smith (as seen inthe ads below), that helped turn a profit for the company.
Top left: Colorless glass bottle embossed with with “Esquire Lano Wax”; Middle left: Close up view of Esquire “Lano Wax” bottle (Images courtesy of Rhian Dunn); Bottom Left: Mid-20th century black and white advertisement for Esquire boot polish (Image source); Right: Mid-20th century color advertisement for Esquire “Lano Wax” (Image Source).
While the Adams brothers sold the company in the late 1950s, the Esquire brand has continued to change owners and still sells shoe polish today! The bottom of this artifact reads “KNOMARK MFG CO. INC. BKLYN, N.Y.,” which helps us identify that this particular bottle was sold while the company was still based in New York and when it was sold from the Esquire Building on 330 Wythe Ave (which was bought out in 1984 and later turned into a condo).
Our bottle is missing its cap, which would have held a built in brush for application purposes!
Check out this vintage advertisement for Esquire Lano Wax!
Bear-ly Containing Our Excitement
This week, we would like to showcase a Ruth Van Tellingen Bendel Bear Salt and Pepper Shaker found at the Service Road construction project. Although we do not have both, this artifact is one of a set of two interlocking figurines!
Image courtesy of Autumn Painter.
We are able to identify this artifact due to the maker’s mark on the bottom, which reads “Van Tellingen // © BEAR HUG.” We can trace this artifact back to a patent by artist Ruth Van Tellingen in 1951 for a “condiment dispenser comprising interlocking figurines.” However, we also know that the word “Bendel” was added to the maker’s mark in 1958 – as “Bendel” is not included on this artifact, we can trace it back to a narrow range of 1951-58!
This precise dating fits in well with the previous artifacts we’ve looked at as a part of this series, helping us get a better picture for the time period this deposit represents!
Research credit: Emily Milton
Setting the Record Straight
As we continue to look at our artifacts from the Service Road construction project, we found this week’s artifact: An Edison Diamond Disc! This small red disc looks like an old music record, but was actually used with a machine, called the V.P. Edison Voicewriter (image 3), to record voice memos in the office!
With the simple press of a button, the machine would scratch a message into the disc, which could be played back at a later time for transcription or other purposes. While previous versions of these dictation machines (called “Dictaphones”) existed, they were bulky and relied on substrate, often wax, which could be easily scratched, reducing the quality of the recording. To combat this, the release of V.P. Edison Voicewriter in 1953 stood out in the market for its portability and the red 7-inch plastic discs (like our artifact!) that could withstand wear and tear. In fact, we at CAP are interested in finding out just how durable these discs are!
We have begun the process of researching just how we might be able to play the recording on this disc to not only see a bit of our history, but listen to it too!! We can’t wait to share what we learn!
The Sweet Smell of Success…fuly Dating this Bottle
This week, we are highlighting a product that may be more familiar to viewers: An Old Spice cologne bottle!
But while you may have heard of this brand name or seen it in grocery stores, you have probably never seen it in this form! Original Old Spice bottles from 1938 featured a labeled with a large ship, as seen on our artifact, but the words “Old” And “Spice” were on either side of the centered ship. As our artifact has “Old Spice” underneath the ship, and has a paragraph of instructions on the back, we can identify that this bottle dates to 1956-1966!
This applied color label was able to tell us a lot of information despite its damaged appearance – one of the reasons we have strict artifact cleaning instructions! In order to avoid further damage to applied color labels, CAP fellows steer clear of any water or soap – instead, just a dry brush is used carefully. And while this artifact has been useful in continuing to confirm the date of the overall Service Road construction collection, we are hoping to use it in a new project looking at hygiene products used at MSU – and perhaps doings some analyses on the liquids still contained within them to see whether any remnants of the original product still remain!
Cutty Sark Whiskey: Whetting one’s Whistle on a Dry Campus
This week, our artifact takes the form of a large, green bottle with lettering that reads “FEDERAL LAW FORBIDS SALE OR RE-USE OF THIS BOTTLE” and “BERRY BROS & RUDD LTD, LONDON, ENGLAND.” Although there is no paper label or applied color label on this bottle, the company – Berry Bros & Rudd LTD – gives us some great clues about the origin of this bottle! This bottle was a bit tricky to date for our lab team. One one hand, the bottle seems to have been hand-made using a mouth-blown bottle mold, a method that was largely replaced by bottle-blowing machines in the early 1900s–we can tell by the mold lines on the top and base of the bottle. On the other hand, the “Federal Law Forbids…” label came only began in 1935! We had to dig deeper to understand why a bottle no older than the mid-1930s was produced using methods from the 1800s!
Berry Bros & Ruff LTD are a company that has been in operation since the 1600s and is famous for its wine selection today. While they operate outside of the US, they actually played a huge role during probation in the 1920s. In an effort to branch in the US market, they created a new whiskey, Cutty Sark, in 1923 to sell in the Bahamas, a popular stop for alcohol smugglers. Cutty Sark sold so well in the US that 80,000 cases sold after the probation was appealed and it became one of the post popular whiskeys in the 1960s. The age of the company the fact that the bottle held imported whiskey, may explain the anachronistic (out of time) method of production–we think that maybe this was an expensive, specialty liquor at the time of purchase. It is possible that Berry Bros & Ruff used older methods at some point, either to highlight the exclusivity of Cutty Sark or because they produced the liquor in relatively small quantities, an did not need a bottle machine.
Considering the history of this whiskey within the company and the shape, color, and lettering on this bottle, it is very likely a Cutty Sark! And, because Cutty Sark switched to a screw bottle cap from a cork around 1970/71, we can then approximately date our bottle from 1923-1969! We can further narrow this date to between 1935 – 1964, because of the “Federal Law Forbids..” label, which was required by U.S. law during those years. So, who ever was drinking this Cutty Sark whiskey may have been breaking MSU anti-alcohol policy, but was not skirting federal prohibition.